Humanistic Tradition
The best known interpreter and proponent of humanism in language teaching was Earl Stevick who was not satisfied with audio lingual habit theory and cognitive code learning.
He concluded that success or failure in language teaching depended not so much on deductive or inductive techniques but he believed that the positive attitude towards the teacher, the classmates , the target language and culture are the most relevant aspects to consider when we speak about language learning.
The most important functions of the teacher according to Earl Stevick are:
- The cognitive function: the teacher possesses the knowledge that students need to manage.
- The classroom management function: students and society think that teachers are responsible for how the student’s time is used in class.
- Practical goals: Students and society have language goals that must be included in language teaching syllabuses.
- The personal and interpersonal function: teachers have the responsibility to set the tone or interpersonal classroom climate which is needed to learn the target language.
- The teacher needs to be warm and enthusiastic to teach.
1. Community Language Learning ( CLL) devised by Curran 1972
“Learning another language is probably the most anxiety provoking activity an individual can undertake in the classroom.” (Nunan, 1991)
The primary aim of CLL is to create a genuinely warm and supportive
“ community” among the learners and gradually to move them from complete dependence on the teacher to complete autonomy.” ( Nunan, 1991
The method works in the following way: an homogeneous group of first language learners work with a bilingual teacher. If a student wants to say something he whispers to the teacher the word he wants to say using L1. The teacher translates the word into L2 and whispers back. The student is able to repeat the word to the group. These words are recorded and then the tape is replayed, analysed and used as the basis of more formal language. At the beginning the method was developed to teach a homogeneous group it was then modified to teach heterogeneous gropus.
The method has been developed to pitch directly at the emotions and attitudes of the learners and one of its weaknesses is that it can release not only positive but also negative emotions if the students feel uncomfortable with the climate generated inside the classrooms.
2. The Silent Way devised by Gattegno 1972
The method developed by Gattegno also establishes the importance of the emotional state of the learner in the learning process.
Students know that they are going to learn a foreign language and the teacher uses only the target language in the classroom. In this case the teacher uses a rod and he shows the rod to the students and he expects the students to say the word “ rod” when they see it. Then the teacher adds color and repeat green rod, red rod etc.
The method is artificial and it is the spirit of the language that has to get hold of our minds.
“ Like Curran , he emphasizes the need to develop in learners an autonomy from the teacher and the teaching situation. He also claims that the method is learner-centred in that teaching is subordinated to learning. Despite these claims, the method is highly controlled, and extremely manipulative of the students.” (Nunan, 1991)
3.Suggestopedia devised by Lozonov
Lozonov believes “ that the human mind is capable of prodigious feats of memory if learning takes place under the appropriate conditions. He attempts to realize the hidden potential of the mind by getting students to learn in a state of deep relaxation bordering on hypnosis.” (Nunan, 1991)
Ostrander and Schroeder 1981 suggested that students could learn between 1000- 3000 words a day.